Implementation Notes

Print version

2. Implementation Notes

2.1. Link calculation

Before a microwave link can be installed, an analysis and calculation of the microwave link must be made first. The analysis should take place before the site survey itself to get a clear idea about the dimensions of the antennas. The analysis consists of the following steps:

  • Free space loss calculation

  • Link budget calculation

  • Rain attenuation

  • Multipath fading

  • Fade margin

  • Fresnel zones calculation

This chapter explains the individual steps and an example of link design is given at the end.

NOTE: For quick reference you can use the calculator on www.racom.eu

2.1.1. Free space loss calculation

As the electromagnetic waves travel through open space they are attenuated. This attenuation is described as Free-space Loss. The loss depends on the distance travelled by signal and its frequency. Longer distance and higher frequency both mean greater attenuation. Free-space loss can be calculated thus:

FSL = 32.44 + 20log f + 20log D

Where:

FSL

free-space loss (dB)

f

frequency of the emitted signal (MHz)

D

length of the link (km)

2.1.2. Link budget calculation

The goal is to design a link producing a received signal stronger than the receiver’s sensitivity at the required BER (typically 10-6). Since every radio signal in earth atmosphere is subject to fading, some difference between received signal level under normal circumstances and receiver sensitivity is needed to serve as a fade margin. The minimum value of fade margin can be calculated from the requirement for link availability (e.g. 99.999% of the time). The required margin depends on the length of the link as well as other factors such as rain attenuation, diffraction and multipath propagation.

If we ignore the additional loss along the path, the received signal strength can be calculated using the formula for signal propagation in free space as follows:

PR = PT + GT + GRFSL

Where

PR

received power level (dBm)

PT

transmitted power (dBm)

GT

transmitting antenna gain (dBi)

GR

receiving antenna gain (dBi)

FSL

free space loss (dB)

PR must be:

PR > PS

Where:

PS

receiver sensitivity (dBm)

The receiver’s sensitivity defines the minimum level of the received signal at which the receiver is able to process the signal without losses or affecting the transmitted data (for BER better then 10-6).

2.1.3. Fade margin

Determining sufficient fade margin is the most important step in microwave link design. If the margin is too small, the link will be unstable – as a result, sufficient availability of the link or quality of the provided services cannot be guaranteed. On the other hand, unnecessarily large margin makes the link more expensive (higher performance, larger and more expensive antennas) and increases the cost of creating the microwave link.

The following paragraphs describe the two most significant types of signal strength loss – rain and multipath attenuation, which are the most frequent along with free space loss. Mutual relation between rain and multipath attenuation rules out the possibility that the link could be affected by both types of attenuation at the same time – these types of attenuation do not add up. To determine the fade margin it is necessary to calculate both rain and multipath attenuation. The larger of the two types of attenuation determines the value of fade margin. In areas with high precipitation, rain attenuation can be expected to be more prominent. By contrast, links located in drier climates and little inclination, will suffer more from multipath attenuation.

2.1.4. Rain attenuation

For frequencies of about 10 GHz rain attenuation starts to become increasingly effective. Precipitation is not identical in all areas which is why ITU released a recommendation Rec. ITU-R PN.837-1 for splitting the world into 15 regions according to precipitation intensity see Fig. 2.1, for more detail Appendix B, Rain zone map. In the areas with higher precipitation greater rain attenuation must be expected and a greater signal fade margin must be established; see the calculation of link availability.

The following properties are inherent to rain attenuation:

  • It increases exponentially with rain intensity

  • It becomes significantly larger as the distance travelled increases (>10 Km)

  • Horizontal polarization causes greater rain attenuation than vertical polarization

  • Rain outage increases dramatically with frequency and path length

Rain zone map, based on Rec.ITU-R PN.837-1

Fig. 2.1: Rain zone map, based on Rec.ITU-R PN.837-1

Rain attenuation can be calculated using ITU-R outage model, which consists of the following:

Obtain the rain rate R0.01 exceeded for 0.01 per cent of the time (with an integration time of 1 min). R0.01 values are defined for 15 rain zones and different time percentages and they are given in ITU-R Recommendation P.837.

Tab. 2.1: Rain rate R (mm/h) ITU-R P.837

Percentage of time (%)ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQ
1.0<0.10.50.72.10.61.7328152451214
0.30.822.84.52.44.5741342711153449
0.1235868121020121522356572
0.035691312152018282333406510596
0.018121519222830323542606395145115
0.0031421262941544555457010595140200142
0.001223242427078658355100150120180250170

Compute specific attenuation γR (dB/km) for the frequency, polarization, specific rain rate using ITU-R recommendation P.838. Rain attenuation for rain rate γR0.01 can be calculated as follows:

γR0.01 = kh,v .R0.01αh,v

where:

kh,v, αh,v

constants for horizontal and vertical polarization. Constants are slightly different for each polarization, see next table according to ITU-R P.838

Tab. 2.2: Constants k, α for horizontal and vertical polarization at 10, 11, 17 and 24 GHz

 khαhkvαv
10 GHz0.011.260.011.22
11 GHz0.021.210.021.16
17 GHz0.061.090.071.01
24 GHz0.141.010.140.96

 

Attenuation for 10 GHz, polarization H, V

Fig. 2.2: Attenuation for 10 GHz,
polarization H, V

Attenuation for 11 GHz, polarization H, V

Fig. 2.3: Attenuation for 11 GHz,
polarization H, V

 

Attenuation for 17 GHz, polarization H, V

Fig. 2.4: Attenuation for 17 GHz,
polarization H, V

Attenuation for 24 GHz, polarization H, V

Fig. 2.5: Attenuation for 24 GHz,
polarization H, V

 

Fig. 2.2 shows that rain attenuation is greater for horizontal polarization. In regions with higher precipitation the difference in attenuation is more marked. The microwave links RAy17 and RAy24 use both polarizations, hence the need to consider the worse of the two, i.e. horizontal polarization. When ACM is active we recommend using horizontal polarization in the direction with lower data traffic (typically up-link).

2.1.5. Multipath fading

Multipath fading is another dominant fading mechanism. A reflected wave causes a phenomenon known as multipath, meaning that the radio signal can travel multiple paths to reach the receiver. Typically, multipath occurs when a reflected wave reaches the receiver at the same time in opposite phase as the direct wave that travels in a straight line from the transmitter.

Multipath propagation gives rise to two kinds of signal degrading effects, i.e., flat fading and frequency selective fading. Flat fading is a reduction in input signal level where all frequencies in the channel of interest are equally affected and is dependent on path length, frequency, and path inclination. In addition, it is strongly dependent on the geoclimatic factor K.

To calculate the probability of outage due to multipath propagation of microwave links the ITU-R probability model can be used which describes a single frequency (or narrowband) fading distribution suitable for large fade depths A in the average worst month in any part of the world (based on ITU-R P.530-14). The calculation for detailed link design is given as follows [1]:

P0 = Kd3.4(1+|εP|)-1.03f0.8×100.00067hL-A/10

where:

d

link distance (km)

f

frequency (GHz)

hL

altitude of lower antenna (m)

A

fade depth (dB)

K

is geoclimatic factor and can be obtained from:

K = 10-4.6-0.0027dN1

The term dN1 is provided on a 1.5° grid in latitude and longitude in ITU-R Recommendation P.453. The data are available in a tabular format and are available from the Radiocommunication Bureau (BR). E.g. in Central Europe the values d​N1 range from -242 to -362.

From the antenna heights he and hr (meters above sea level), calculate the magnitude of the path inclination │εP│ (mrad) using the following expression:

where:

d

link distance (km)

hr, he

antenna heights above sea level (m)

2.1.6. Fresnel zones calculation

The position of obstacles between points of the bridge can significantly influence the quality of the microwave link. The radio signal doesn’t only radiate along the line of sight, but also in the area around it, i.e. in the so-called 1st Fresnel zone. Within this zone 90 % of the energy is transmitted between the transmitter and receiver antenna. This space has the shape of an ellipsoid. If it is disturbed the link has poorer transmission properties and a higher quality antenna is required. For this reason the position of the antenna can be just as important as its height above ground. 60 % of the 1st Fresnel zone is considered as the most important.

Fresnel zone

Fig. 2.6: Fresnel zone

The general equation for calculating the first Fresnel zone radius at any point P in between the endpoints of the link is the following:

Where:

F1

first Fresnel Zone radius in metres

d1

distance of P from one end in metres

d2

The distance of P from the other end in metres

λ

wavelength of the transmitted signal in metres

The cross sectional radius of each Fresnel zone is the highest in the center of link, shrinking to a point at the antenna on each end. For practical applications, it is often useful to know the maximum radius of the first Fresnel zone. From the above formula, calculation of the first Fresnel zone can be simplified to:

where:

r

max radius of first Fresnel zone (m)
reducing the radius to 60% get values ​​listed in the following table that define the space particularly sensitive to the presence of obstacles

D

total link distance (km)

f

frequency (GHz)

Tab. 2.3: 60 % of the 1st Fresnel zone

Length of link DRadius of zone r for frequency
11 GHz17 GHz24 GHz
0,5 km1.10 m0.89 m0.75 m
1 km1.56 m1.25 m1.06 m
2 km2.21 m1.77 m1.50 m
4 km3.13 m2.50 m2.12 m
6 km3.84 m3.07 m2.60 m
8 km4.43 m3.54 m3.00 m
10 km4.95 m3.96 m3.35 m
15 km6.06 m4.85 m4.10 m
20 km7.00 m5.60 m4.74 m
50 km11.07 m  

2.2. Example of microwave link design

Design flowchart

Fig. 2.7: Design flowchart

Step 1 – Requirements Determination
Link parameters:
 Link distance: 4 km
 First antenna height above sea level: 295 m
 Second antenna height above sea level: 320 m
 Location: Central Europe (rain zone H, refraction gradient dN1= −300)
Transmission requirements:
 Required data rate: >160 Mbps
 Required availability: 99.99 %
RAy parameters:
 17 GHz
 161 Mbps -> Modulation 16QAM; BW=56 MHz; PS(BER 10-6)= −79 dBm
 Tx power +5 dBm (max. Tx power)
 Antenna gain:
  30 cm    …  32.2 dBi
  60 cm    …  37.8 dBi
  99 cm    …  42 dBi
Step 2 – Free space loss calculation
  FSL = 32.44 + 20log f + 20log D = 32.44 + 20log17.2·103 + 20log4 = 129.1 dB
   
Step 3a – Rain attenuation
 For 99.99% availability in rain zone B the rain rate is R0.01=32 (see Fig. 2.1)
 For f=17 GHz kh=0.06146; αh=1.0949; kv=0.06797; αv=1.0137
 Vertical polarization:
  γR0.01 = kv .Rαv0.01 = 0.07 · 321.01 = 2.32 dB/km => for 4km distance 9.3 dB
 Horizontal polarization:
  γR0.01 = kh .Rαh0.01 = 0.06 · 321.09 = 2.62 dB/km => for 4km distance 10.5 dB
   
Step 3b – Attenuation due to multipath propagation
 We have to find required fade margin for reliability of the link 99.99 percent.
 Path inclination:
  
 The percentage of time that fade depth A (dB) is exceeded in the average worst month is calculated as:
  

P0 = Kd3.4(1+|εP|)-1.03f0.8×100.00067hL-A/10

  P0 = 10-4.6-0.0027×(-300)×43.4(1+|6.25|)-1.0317.20.8×100.032×10-0.00067×295A/10
  P0 = 0.022871×10-0.19765A/10
 For reliability 99.99% is P0=0.01 we get exponential function for A:
  

A = -0.19765 – 10log(0.01/0.022871) = 3.4 dB

 The minimum fade margin required to suppress multipath fading on this link would be 4 dB.
   
Step 4 – Choice of Tx power and antennas
Step 5 – and Link budget calculation
 Calculation in steps 3a and 3b determines the minimum fade margin required for stable link operation as 11 dB (rain attenuation is dominant). If you use the maximum performance of antenna with diameter of 30 cm, complete the radio formula as follows:
  

PR = PT + GT + GRFSL = 5 + 32.2 + 32.2 − 129.1 = −59.7 dB

 Fade margin:
  

A = |PS| − |PR| = 79 − 59.7 = 19.3 dB

 

The resulting fade margin is larger than the required 11 dB. Current legislation in the Czech Republic allows maximum EIRP of +20, i.e. the sum of transmit power and antenna gain at the transmitter can be 20 dB at the most. For 99cm antennas, TX power can be up to 20 – 42 = -22 dB, the resultant equation is as follows:

  

PR = PT + GT + GRFSL = -22 + 42 + 42 − 129.1 = −67.1 dB

 Fade margin:
  A = |PS| − |PR| = 79 − 67.1 = 11.9 dB
 Fade margin is now only 12 dB which corresponds to link availability > 99.99% of the time in a year.
 Technical literature often gives the minimum fade margin of 20 dB. For very long links (more than 10 km) fade margin will, indeed, be approximately 20 dB. For shorter links, however, such large margin is not necessary. It is helpful to first conduct the calculation above to receive an idea of the attenuation affecting the link.
  
The result
 To achieve the required transmission capacity and link availability for link distance of 4 km, transmit power -22 dBm and 99 cm antennas were selected for both sides of the link.

Sources for this chapter:

[1] Lehpamer, H.: Microwave transmission network, Second edition, ISBN: 0071701222, McGraw-Hill Professional, 2010.

ITU-R recommendation used:

  • ITU-R P.453-10 – The radio refractive index: its formula and refractivity data

  • ITU-R P.530-14 – Propagation data and prediction methods required for the design of terrestrial line-of-sight systems

  • ITU-R P.837-1 and 6 – Characteristics of precipitation for propagation modelling

  • ITU-R P.838-3 – Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods

  • ITU-R P.310, ITU-R P.526, ITU-R P.676, ITU-R P.834, ITU-R P.835